| |
Vioxx Class Action Update - December 23, 2009
- On July 28, 2008, the same day that Justice Cullity certified this Ontario Class Action as a national class action (excluding Saskatchewan and Québec[1]), Justice Cullity also dismissed a motion by Merck seeking to stay this action (i.e. to temporarily or permanently halt the Ontario Class Action) on the basis of a Saskatchewan class action lawsuit (which lawsuit was also in respect of Vioxx use but differed significantly from the Ontario proceedings).
- In November 2008, counsel attended the Divisional Court as Merck sought Leave to Appeal (i.e. permission to appeal) both the certification decision and decision with respect to a stay of proceedings.
- On November 24, 2008, Justice Bellamy of the Divisional Court, denied leave to appeal the certification decision but granted leave to appeal with respect to the stay of proceedings.
- In February 2009, Counsel attended the Divisional Court to argue the appeal with respect to the stay of proceedings. The Divisional Court dismissed Merck's appeal from the stay motion.
- Merck sought further leave to appeal to the Ontario Court of Appeal, but was refused. Merck then sought leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. On October 22, 2009, the Supreme Court refused to grant it permission to appeal.
- In June 2009, Merck brought a motion for leave to appeal the decision of Justice Bellamy (November 24, 2008) refusing it leave to appeal in respect of certification and, alte rnatively, asking Justice Bellamy to reconsider her earlier decision. Merck relied on the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal's decision overturning the Saskatchewan certification, to argue that certification should also be overturned in Ontario as well. The parties appeared before Justice Bellamy on August 14, 2009.
- On December 7, 2009, Justice Bellamy refused to grant leave to appeal from her earlier decision (refusing leave to appeal) and (after reconsideration) refusing leave to appeal from certification.
|
|